United States v. Quicksey’s Empirical Analysis
525 F.2d 337 · 1975
Citation profile
58 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably United States v. Sullivan (1990), State v. Frye (1978)
58 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 851 (§ 411 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Berger v. United States · United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. · Testa v. United States · James v. Valtierra · United States v. Noland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he record depicts the offenses in such unique detail that he is protected from subsequent prosecutions for the same crimes.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the absence of a special verdict, it is not possible to ascertain [which statute] the jury intended to find the defendant guilty of conspiracy to violate ...”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.