Haas v. Peake’s Empirical Analysis
525 F.3d 1168 · 2008
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably State v. Johnson (2009), Thun v. Shinseki (2009)
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 101 (Agent Orange Act of 1991) · 38 U.S.C. § 1116 · 38 U.S.C. § 316 · 38 U.S.C. § 501 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Auer v. Robbins · Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital · Christensen v. Harris County · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after active military, naval, or air service”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that require the veterans' death or disability be based on actual exposure to herbicides containing dioxin. Id. at 2727-28 . The 1984 Dioxin Act noted that there was evidence that specific diseases-chloracne, porphyria cutanea tarda, and soft tissue sarcoma-were linked to exposure to dioxin-containing herbicides. Id. at 2725 . Thereafter, the VA promulgated § 3.311a. The § 3.311a rulemaking notice noted that herbicides”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Procopio v. Wilkie“General notice of proposed rule making shall be published in the Federal Register, unless persons subject thereto are named and either personally served or otherwise have actual notice thereof in accordance with law. [T]his subsection does not apply — (A) to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice^]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.