Miller v. Blacketter’s Empirical Analysis
525 F.3d 890 · 2008
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Ungar v. Sarafite · Wheat v. United States · Morris v. Slappy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“wide latitude in balancing the right to counsel of choice against the needs of fairness. . . and against the demands of its calendar.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Patterson v. State“expressly stated it would treat the claim as preserved and proceeded to assess the merits”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“it was unclear how much time a new attorney, onee hired, would have needed to prepare”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. People v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.