525 F. Supp. 24 - Yaretsky v. Blum’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2006
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320C (§ 1151 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1320C
Relies on Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · 113 F. Supp. 265 - T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. · Emle Industries, Inc. v. Patentex, Inc. · Board of Education v. Nyquist · Government of India v. Cook Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A lawyer should preserve the confidences and secrets of a client.” (Canon 4 may have inspired the current Rule 1.9, which addresses instances of serial representation.) Canon 5 provided:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.