525 F. Supp. 2d 198 - Bender v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I hereby agree that I will repay the Bank any amounts so paid on my behalf by the Bank if it is later determined that I am not entitled to indemnification with respect to the litigation under 12 C.F.R. § 121 [sic], and I represent that I have sufficient assets to repay my fair share of such amounts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bender v. Jordan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.