Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2005
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Glasser v. United States · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Holloway v. Arkansas · Screws v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The legislature has distinguished between child neglect which results in serious bodily injury ® and neglect which results in the child's death." "3. The legislature may not have intended the child neglect statute to encompass neglect which results in the death of the dependent child, expecting such cases to be charged under one of the homicide provisions. The neglect statute specifically provides that '... the offense is a class B felony if it results in serious bodily injury.. Ind. Code § 35-46-1-4 (a)(4) (Burns 1985 Repl.). The present definition of serious bodily injury is specific. Ind. Code § 35-41-1-25 (Burns 1985 Repl). This statutory definition includes bodily injury which creates a substantial risk of death but omits injury which results in death, the latter being expressly in cluded in the former definitional seetion. Ind. Code § 85-41-1-2 (Burns 1979 Repl.)."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hill v. State · Fisher v. State“We have never held that the possibility of prejudice that `inheres in almost every instance of multiple representation' justifies the adoption of an inflexible rule that would presume prejudice in all such cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wimberly v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.