Whitsel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2018
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hinkle v. State · State v. Mark · Jones v. State · Polly v. State · State v. Whitsel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ineffective assistance of counsel may constitute “sufficient reason” for failure to raise an issue in an earlier trial or direct appeal. It does not, however, constitute a claim that “could not have been raised within the applicable time period” under section 822.3.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dible v. State“must be filed within three years from the date the conviction or decision is final or, in the event of an appeal, from the date the writ of procedendo is issued.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[n]ewly discovered evidence would constitute a 'ground of fact' under the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.