Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 525 P3D 39 - BUCK v. STATE

BUCK v. STATE’s Empirical Analysis

2023

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Neder v. United States · DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial District · Alleyne v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Kickapoo Tribe thereupon, on September 9, 1891 did 'cede, convey, transfer, and relinquish, forever and absolutely, without any reservation whatever, all their claim, title, and interest' to the reservation lands. In consideration each of the Kickapoos, estimated at about 300 in number, was allotted 80 acres of such land with a per capita cash payment. The transaction was ratified, and carried out on the part of the United States and the land acquired by the United States was opened to settlement. Thus, the Kickapoo reservation was obliterated, the tribal lands were no more, and only individual allotments survived. We think it clear that the term 'reservation' as used in the statutes in question had no application to such lands.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) whether he was denied the presumption of innocence; (2) whether he was denied effective assistance of counsel; (3) whether he was denied his constitutional right to have all elements of the crimes charged submitted to and decided by the jury; (4) whether his sentence is excessive; and (5) whether the district court lacked jurisdiction to try his case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The said Kickapoo Tribe of Indians in the Indian Territory hereby cede, convey, transfer, and relinquish, forever and absolutely, without any reservation whatever, all their claim, title, and interest of every kind and character in and to the lands embraced in the following described track of country in the Indian Territory. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.