HELLER v. BALLINGER’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The Attorney for the Child would inform the Court that after having reviewed the Appellant/Respondent's Brief, as well as the Answer Brief of the Appellee/ Petitioner we concur with the argument and authority cited and laid out in said Appellant's Brief. The Attorney for the Child would not add any additional information, but would agree and maintain Appellant/Respondent's stance on the matter that the trial court's Orders were erroneous and that clear and convincing evidence did not support the trial court's rulings as to the eligibility for adoption without consent and the best interest of the minor child. Therefore, the trial court's ruling should be overturned for the reasons laid out in Appellant/ Respondent's Brief.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2023 OK CIV APP 4 - HELLER v. BALLINGER

2. “So my first line that I responded to was to ease that, I said, I know, but just think you're going to get to see [AMH] so soon. And he said, Am I though? There have been confirmed cases on the ship and people have been getting medevaced and quarantined in their rooms. I'm doing the best I can to stay healthy but it feels like only a matter of time. As much as I want to come and see you-all when I get off, I'm in a small area that has been exposed to the virus and it's not like I'm going to be able to find a COVID-19 test clinic at any hospital, so I'm F'd. I have no idea when I'll be able to come down and spend real time with this virus going on and it's F'ing me up.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2023 OK CIV APP 4 - HELLER v. BALLINGER

3. “of a substantial and positive relationship. Mother indicated that she did not tell AMH about Father's planned December visit. ¶14 Father's mother testified that she visited AMH three times in 2020. While AMH was with her during those visits, she would contact Father through FaceTime. ¶15 The trial court found that pursuant to 10 O.S.2011 § 7505-4.2(H)(1),(3), AMH is eligible for adoption without Father's consent because he”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2023 OK CIV APP 4 - HELLER v. BALLINGER