Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

525 So. 2d 1009

Murphy v. Hoenigmann

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-05-31

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2007

4 state decisions

Relies on 213 So. 2d 635 - Carberry v. Foley · Carberry v. Foley · 334 So. 2d 647 - Brown v. Vining

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-05-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Finding that the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial, competent evidence, we affirm the Final Judgment. See Brown v. Taylor, 500 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. Vining, 334 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); In re Estate of Agardy v. Dunn, 293 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); McDonough v. Rudisill, 229 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So.2d 532 (Fla.1970); Carberry v. Foley, 213 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So.2d 750 (Fla.1969).

¶2Affirmed.

/525/so2d/1009 · .json · Public domain