525 So. 2d 1187 - Barraza v. Scheppegrell’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 359 So. 2d 1256 - Everett v. Goldman · Disotell v. Wadsworth Golf Const. Co. · 419 So. 2d 1302 - Williams v. St. Paul Ins. Companies · 460 So. 2d 8 - Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Larose · Clay v. J.P. Lapeyrouse, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This, procedural rule, however, has no correlation to Louisiana law. In our case, Ms. Martin raised the issue of qualified health care provider in a motion for summary judgment. She was not required, either through the statute or the Code of Civil Procedure, to raise it earlier. Under the statute, all malpractice claims shall be reviewed by a medical review panel, a right which can be waived if not raised through an exception of prematurity. Here, Ms. Martin was not obligated to raise an exception to establish her status. Under La. C.C.P. art. 1003, Ms. Martin was obligated to assert all”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.