Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 525 SO2D 1279 - Neal v. State

Neal v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

91 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Neal v. Puckett (2002), Myers v. State (1991)

91 state decisions

5301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Townsend v. Sain · Rose v. Lundy · Hitchcock v. Dugger · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether counsel's performance was deficient, and, if so, (2) whether the deficient performance was prejudicial to the defendant in the sense that our confidence in the correctness of the outcome is undermined.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “§ 99-39-11. Judicial examination of original motion; dismissal; filing answer. (1) The original motion, together with all the files, records, transcripts and correspondence relating to the judgment under attack, shall be examined promptly by the judge to whom it is assigned. (2) If it plainly appears from the face of the motion, any annexed exhibits and the prior proceedings in the case that the movant is not entitled to any relief, the judge may make an order for its dismissal and cause the prisoner to be notified. (Emphasis added)”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a claim procedurally alive `substantial[ly] showing denial of a state or federal right.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.