State v. Anthony’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. DeLaRose · Ray v. South Central Bell Tel. Co. · 491 So. 2d 361 - State v. Salgologo · 303 So. 2d 877 - Ray v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. · State v. Henderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In any event, we do not interpret R.S. 15:85 as requiring actual notice. Due process under article 1, § 2 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 and the fifth and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution requires | inthat in an action to deprive a person of life, liberty, or property, the person must be given notice of the proceedings and a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case. Due process does not demand that a party actually receive the notice, it only requires that the method of service used be reasonably calculated to give the party actual notice, (citation omitted). In the instant case, the state proved that it sent defendant notice of the hearing dates to the addresses he furnished. It would be a travesty of justice for this court to find that because Anthony thwarted the state’s efforts to deliver the notices to him, he was never obligated to appear in court. Accordingly, defendant’s failure to receive actual notice of the second arraignment date does not prevent the state from seeking the forfeiture of Sunbelt’s bond due to his nonappearance. Anthony, 525 So.2d at 249 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“will at all times hold himself amenable to the orders and process of the Court ... and shall not depart thence without the leave of said Court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.