Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 525 So. 2d 477 - Smith v. State

525 So. 2d 477 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably D.N. v. State (2003), Smith v. State (1988)

30 state decisions

1301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co. · Jones v. Howard · Bottoson v. Florida · Post v. Ohio · Harris v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the time actually available for preparation, (2) the likelihood of prejudice from the denial, (3) the defendant's role in shortening preparation time, (4) the complexity of the case, (5) the availability of discovery, (6) the adequacy of counsel actually provided, and (7) the skill and experience of chosen counsel and his pre-retention experience with the defendant or the alleged crime.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. D.N. v. State · Miller v. State
  2. “The common thread running through those cases in which a palpable abuse of discretion has been found is that defense counsel must be afforded an adequate opportunity to investigate and prepare any applicable defense.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 920 So. 2d 1252 - MF v. State · 547 So. 2d 288 - Beachum v. State
  3. “unless a palpable abuse of discretion is demonstrated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 561 So. 2d 419 - Robinson v. State · 547 So. 2d 288 - Beachum v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.