Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 525 SO2D 682 - Dusenbery v. Andras

Dusenbery v. Andras’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 376 So. 2d 495 - Calk v. Highland Const. & Mfg. · 490 So. 2d 1093 - Walton v. Walton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the agreed upon contingency fee, taxable court costs advanced by the attorney, and the attorney's necessary and reasonable expenses in pursuance of the litigation, such as those for investigation and travel. It does not include other advances which are in the nature of a loan, nor does it include the payment or reimbursement of expenses which, like medical bills, constitutes the client's special damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.