Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 525 SW2D 758 - Palermo v. Cottom

Palermo v. Cottom’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 1992 · most notably Burnett v. Griffith (1989), Zahorsky v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C. (1985)

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

190197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hoene v. Associated Dry Goods Corporation · Higgins v. Knickmeyer-Fleer Realty & Investment Co. · Randol v. Kline's, Inc. · Tucker v. Duncan · Bonzo v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Probable cause for initiating [a criminal] prosecution is defined as reasonable grounds for suspicion, supported by circumstances in evidence sufficiently strong to warrant a cautious man in his belief that the person accused is guilty of the offense charged, [citations omitted.] Probable cause is reasonable cause, not necessarily actual cause. We must consider the facts as the prosecuting party could have reasonably believed them to be under the circumstances at the time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person's acts may be the legal cause of prosecution if instituted at his insistence and request. It is sufficient if his action takes the form of an affidavit on which the case is based, regardless of further participation in the prosecution.... To impose liability there must be affirmative action by way of advice, encouragement, pressure or something similar in the institution, or causing the institution of the prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The elements of a cause for malicious prosecution are: (1) commencement of prosecution of the proceedings against the present plaintiff; (2) its legal causation by the present defendant; (3) its termination in favor of the present plaintiff; (4) absence of probable cause for such proceedings; (5) the presence of malice therein; (6) damage to plaintiff by reason thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.