Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 A2D 1365 - Farmer v. Farmer

Farmer v. Farmer’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2006

10 state decisions

60198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. United States · Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc. · Ibn-Tamas v. United States · United States v. Fay Heasley, Fay Heasley and Selma Heasley v. United States of America and Henry W. Anderberg, Receiver, Fay Heasley and Selma Heasley v. United States of America and Henry W. Anderberg, Receiver · Andrade v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here [a] claim has a rational nexus to a subject matter within the responsibility of a division of the Superior Court, that division may rely upon its general powers in accepting jurisdiction over the claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.