Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 F.2d 1183 - Mumbower v. Callicott

Mumbower v. Callicott’s Empirical Analysis

526 F.2d 1183 · 1975

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
6
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 8 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Lamon v. City of Shawnee (1992), Vadino v. A. Valey Engineers (1990)

35 federal appellate · 8 district · 7 state decisions

240197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 211 · 29 U.S.C. § 255

Relies on Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. Missel · Steiner v. Mitchell · Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp. · Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. Hall · 149 Madison Ave Corporation v. Asselta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “duties performed by an employee before and after scheduled hours, even if not requested ... if the employer 'knows or has reason to believe' the employee is continuing to work, 29 C.F.R. § 785.11, and the duties are an 'integral and indispensable part' of the employee's principal work activity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We think it clear that [the limitation provisions of the Portal-to-Portal Act] was intended as a limitation on the remedy available, not on the right to bring the action, and must be pleaded as an affirmative defense in accordance with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(c) ...”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[s]uch extra work for the employer's benefit and with his tacit approval must be included in determining whether overtime compensation is statutorily required.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.