Herrlein v. Kanakis’s Empirical Analysis
526 F.2d 252 · 1975
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Baldwin-United Corporation (1985), Vuitton Fils v. Carousel Handbags (1979)
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Golden State Bottling Company Inc v. National Labor Relations Board · Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Chase Nat Bank v. City of Norwalk Ohio · Walling v. James V. Reuter, Inc. · Alemite Mfg. Corp. v. Staff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[n]o court can make a decree which will bind any one but a party.... [T]he only occasion when a person not a party may be punished, is when he has helped to bring about, not merely what the decree has forbidden, because it may have gone too far, but what it has the power to forbid, an act of a party. This means that the respondent must either abet the defendant, or must be legally identified with him.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“antithetical to the primary axiom of our jurisprudence that no man shall be subject to judicial sanction without the opportunity for a hearing on the merits of the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.