Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 F.2d 476 - Hamblen v. Ware

Hamblen v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

526 F.2d 476 · 1975

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
October 2001
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2001

5 federal appellate ·

501975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 213

Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc. · United States v. Unicorn Enterprises, Inc. · Walling US v. General Industries Co · Nelson v. County of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Findings of fact . . . may not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.