Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 F.2d 53 - Underhill Construction Corp. v. Secretary of Labor & Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission

Underhill Construction Corp. v. Secretary of Labor & Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission’s Empirical Analysis

526 F.2d 53 · 1975

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2005
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2005

3 federal appellate ·

501975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Frank Irey, Jr., Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Underhill Construction Corporation, Underhill Construction Corp. And Dic Concrete Corp., Individually and as Participants in a Joint Venture Known as Dic-Underhill, a Joint Venture v. Peter J. Brennan and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission · Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · Beall Construction Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “engaged in a business affecting commerce who has employees,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “on May 29, 1971, the Secretary declared the standards previously promulgated under [the Construction Standards Act] to be `established Federal standards' and promulgated them under OSHA, with a general effective date of August 27, 1971”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a standard which requires conditions, or the adoption or use of one or more practices, means, methods, operations, or processes, reasonably necessary or appropriate to provide safe or healthful employment and places of employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.