Gerlinger v. Amazon.com Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
526 F.3d 1253 · 2008
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2023
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Allen v. Wright · Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters · American Ad Management Inc O'Connor Agency v. General Telephone Company of California · Amarel v. Connell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Antitrust standing is distinct from Article III standing. Am. Ad Mgmt., Inc. v. Gen. Tel. Co. of Cal., 190 F.3d 1051, 1054 (9th Cir.1999). Article III standing is required to establish a justiciable case or controversy within the jurisdiction of the federal courts. Antitrust standing is a requirement for treble damages under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 . See Associated Gen. Contractors [of Cal., Inc. v. Cal. State Council of Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519 , 535 & n. 31, 103 S.Ct. 897 , 74 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983) ]. Lack of antitrust standing affects a plaintiffs ability to recover, but does not implicate the subject matter jurisdiction of the court. Datagate, Inc. [v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 60 F.3d 1421 , 1425 n. 1 (9th Cir.1995) ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“mere allegations [of standing], but must set forth by affidavit or other evidence specific facts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.