United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
526 F.3d 306 · 2008
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2022
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3109 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Hudson v. Palmer · Griffin v. Wisconsin · United States v. Knights · Hudson v. Michigan · Samson v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nor, contrary to [defendant’s] suggestion, does Hudson apply only when the officers have a search warrant.”); United States v. Ankeny, 502 F.3d 829 , 835-36 (9th Cir.2007) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“overwhelming interest in supervising parolees because they are more likely to commit future criminal offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.