Jacobs v. Clark County School District’s Empirical Analysis
526 F.3d 419 · 2008
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably McTernan v. City of York (2009), Corales v. Bennett (2009)
15 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · United States v. O'Brien · Carey v. Piphus · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Goss v. Lopez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“completely illogical” and declining to recognize it until Supreme Court expressly does so itself); Littlefield v. Forney Indep. Sch. Dist., 108 F.Supp.2d 681 , 704 (N.D.Tex.2000) (refusing to apply doctrine, which is likely based upon a misreading of Smith, 494 U.S. at 881-82 , 110 S.Ct. 1595 , aff'd 268 F.3d 275 (5th Cir.2001)); Warner v. City of Boca Raton, 64 F.Supp.2d 1272 , 1288 n. 12 (S.D.Fla.1999) (finding hybrid rights language in Smith to be dicta); Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies § 12.3.2.3 at 1215-16 (2d ed.2002) (calling doctrine’s contours”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“First, [it] must have suffered an injury in fact-an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical. Second, there must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of____Third, it must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Symbolic expression of this kind may be forbidden or regulated if the conduct itself may constitutionally be regulated, if the regulation is narrowly drawn to further a substantial government interest, and if the interest is unrelated to the suppression of free speech.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Corales v. Bennett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.