Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 F.3d 48 - Sok v. Mukasey

Sok v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis

526 F.3d 48 · 2008

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Chhay v. Mukasey (2008), Aldana-Ramos v. Holder (2014)

26 federal appellate · 1 district ·

190200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on United States v. Zannino · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Poradisova v. Gonzales · Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Guo v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he absence of reasoned discussion of past persecution undercuts any meaningful review of the [agency's] fear of future persecution finding, because we do not know whether [the applicant] should have had the benefit of the regulatory presumption of fear of persecution based on prior events.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hile the IJ need not address each and every piece of evidence put forth by a - 23 - petitioner, he must at least 'make findings, implicitly if not explicitly, on all grounds necessary for decision.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “However, the agency 'is obligated to offer more explanation when the record suggests strong arguments for the petitioner that the [agency] has not considered.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.