Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 F.3d 981 - Dargis v. Sheahan

Dargis v. Sheahan’s Empirical Analysis

526 F.3d 981 · 2008

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Argyropoulos v. City of Alton (2008), Wilson v. Dollar General Corp. (2013)

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

170200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Carey v. Piphus · Tafflin v. Levitt · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Giles v. NYLCare Health Plans, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The prison has to be able to call upon its full staff of correctional officers for help in putting down a prison riot, and therefore each officer must have experience in the positions, such as searching and escorting inmates, that provide the necessary training and experience for responding effectively to a riot, as well as the capability for such response. Obviously a prison riot is an extreme threat. But there are many other duties that include disciplining prisoners, inspections, intervening in disputes, and dealing with routine but sometimes tense situations that cannot be subtracted from the performance expectations of a correctional officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.