526 F. Supp. 621 - Maloney v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
September 1994
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Weinberger v. Salfi · Sheehan v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no good cause to extend the time to review the ALJ’s decision.” Id. Maloney does stand for the proposition that where the plaintiff has failed to timely file with the Appeals Council without good cause, the "court is without jurisdiction to reconsider the AU’s determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for failure to file timely ... and for failure to show good cause why time to seek review should be extended or why the claim should be reopened.” Id. at 622 (emphasis added). The case did not clarify the issue addressed in Bellantoni , namely, whether the "good cause”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.