In Re Godfrey’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Relies on Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Marin · Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. · In Re Application of Asher B. Edelman · 428 F. Supp. 2d 188 - In Re Microsoft Corp. · Application of Sarrio Sa Chase Manhattan Corporation Sa Sa v. Sarrio Sa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]nsofar as the term 'found' applies to legal rather than natural persons, it may safely be regarded as referring to judicial precedents that equate systematic and continuous local activities with presence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hether the documents or testimony sought are within the foreign tribunal's jurisdictional reach, and thus accessible absent § 1782 aid”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.