Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 NW2D 159 - Jahnke v. Jahnke

Jahnke v. Jahnke’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
5
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2013

10 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 208 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Jimenez v. Weinberger · Cherne Industries, Inc. v. Magallanes · Potts v. Potts · Tigges v. City of Amess · DeVargas v. STATE EX REL. NM DEPT. OF CORR.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the federal government may prosecute a payee who converts a beneficiary's funds, there is no federal mechanism to prevent such a conversion from occurring. Moreover, once the SSA pays the benefits to the proper representative payee, it has no liability to the beneficiary for misuse of the payments.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]e agree with those courts that allow state courts to look into the expenditure of dependent social security benefits when an interested party questions the propriety of those expenditures.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he assumption of state court jurisdiction is based in part on the state's interest in the welfare of children residing within its borders.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.