Winkel v. Erpelding’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2018
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Dowling · Fogel v. Trustees of Iowa College · Peterson 80-2662 v. Crown Financial Corporation 80-2663 · Hoefer v. Wisconsin Education Ass'n Insurance Trust · J. J. Schaefer Livestock Hauling, Inc. v. Gretna State Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To mount a successful resistance, the challenger must come forward with specific facts constituting competent evidence in support of the claim advanced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]here is no genuine issue of fact if there is no evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.