Whitehead v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 1982
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. State · McCluskey v. State · In Re Habeas Corpus of Bishop · 84 Okla. Crim. 94 - Ex Parte Beard · 31 Okla. Crim. 143 - Ross v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Robbery is a wrongful taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Where a pistol is pointed in a threatening manner at one who is the owner or custodian of money, who thereupon permits it to be taken, such act is robbery, although the owner or custodian may not state he is in actual fear, since fear is presumed when such act is committed violently and against the will of the person robbed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hazelwood v. State““First, since the testimony of Officer Shobert was sufficient to establish the element of force, it was unnecessary to further prove the element of fear. See 21 O.S.1971, § 797, supra, which describes robbery as a wrongful taking accomplished by means of force or fear, not force and fear.” (Footnote omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dunford v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.