Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

526 So. 2d 1068

Docket No. 87-1305.

Sullivan v. State

Bobby Gene SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-06-22

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-06-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2016

8 state decisions

401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Bobby Gene Sullivan, pro se.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth C. Masters, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Bobby Gene Sullivan appealed from the trial court's denial of his 3.850 motion for post conviction relief. He alleges that the trial court did not elicit a factual basis for appellant's plea, and that two conditions, a five year probation period and treatment as a mentally disordered sex offender, were fraudulently added onto his negotiated plea document after he signed the agreement. The record before this court does not contain any sentencing or plea colloquy transcripts or other items to enable a sufficient review of these specific allegations and therefore we must reverse. On remand the trial court is directed to attach those portions of the record which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief, or if such showing cannot be determined from the face of the record, conduct an evidentiary hearing. The court should specifically address the above issues raised by appellant in his motion for post conviction relief.

¶5REVERSED AND REMANDED.

¶6SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

/526/so2d/1068 · .json · Public domain