Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 SO2D 173 - Jones v. State

Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 498 So. 2d 863 - Whitehead v. State · 515 So. 2d 748 - Shull v. Dugger · 502 So. 2d 1375 - Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ecause the sole reason initially given for departure from the guidelines, habitual offender status, was found invalid on appeal, the trial court cannot, upon resentencing, exceed the recommended sentence by ascribing the new reasons for departure. See Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla. 1987).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.