Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

526 So. 2d 220

526 So.2d 220

13 Fla.L.Weekly 1397

Cahill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-06-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1988

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm in all respects. However, we remand to the trial court to enter a written order of revocation that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncements: that Count 1, violation of probation for changing residence without consent of probation officer, was dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence; that Count 2, violation of condition of probation for failing to submit monthly reports, was violated in the month of May only; that Count 5, violation of condition of probation for uttering a forged instrument, was violated; and Count 6, violation of probation for grand theft, was violated.

¶2AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
/526/so2d/220 · .json · Public domain