Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 SO2D 378 - State v. Keller

State v. Keller’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Hasting · 445 So. 2d 1184 - State v. Jarman · 408 So. 2d 1229 - State v. Dupre · State v. Bretz · 490 So. 2d 501 - State v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The argument shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the State or defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The State's rebuttal shall be confined to answering the argument of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.