Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 So. 2d 644 - Craig v. State

526 So. 2d 644 - Craig v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Michel v. United States · United States v. Conroy · 33 Ala. App. 316 - Smitherman v. State · United States v. Terebecki · Coon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[w]here the defense of alibi is raised and there is the requisite evidence to support it, proper instructions as to such defense should be given.' 23A C.J.S., [ Criminal Law ] at § 1203 [(1961)]. Failure to do so constitutes reversible error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. ““ ‘The ultimate issue in criminal procedure is the identity of the guilty party, and the fact that the defendant was positively identified ... as a perpetrator of the crime should not deprive him of the benefit of the testimony ... that he was elsewhere, so as to deprive the jury, in considering the case, of the rules of law applicable to such testimony.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.