Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 SO2D 71 - Spalding v. Dugger

Spalding v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2016

8 state decisions

501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania v. Finley · Ross v. Moffitt · Petition of Graham ex rel. Nine Condemned Men v. State · Giarratano v. Murray · 467 So. 2d 698 - State ex rel. Russell v. Schaeffer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the intent of the Legislature to create [CCR] to provide for the representation of any person convicted and sentenced to death in this state who is unable to secure counsel due to indigency, so that collateral proceedings to challenge such conviction may be commenced in a timely manner and so as to assure the people of this state that the judgments of its courts may be regarded with the finality to which they are entitled in the interests of justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “under section 27.702, each defendant under sentence of death is entitled, as a statutory right, to effective legal representation by the capital collateral representative in all collateral relief proceedings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “also to avoid the attendant problems of determining the need to appoint counsel and the utilization of volunteer counsel, including the resulting delays in the process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.