Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 526 So. 2d 749 - Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Cherry

526 So. 2d 749 - Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Cherry’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2018

4 state decisions

601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Presbyterian Church v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church · 458 So. 2d 269 - Florida Bar v. Johnson · 128 So. 2d 594 - Zirin v. Charles Pfizer & Co. · 276 So. 2d 505 - Youngblood v. Citrus Assoc. of NY Cotton Exch., Inc. · 191 So. 2d 427 - Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Simari

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a foreign corporation is not qualified to do business in the State of Florida, the requirements of doing business and connexity must be shown to properly allow in personam jurisdiction. In the instant case, pursuant to section 48.091, Florida Statutes (1985), Rose's Stores, Inc., is qualified to do business in the state... . By having a registered agent in the state, the minimum contacts requirement is met, and connexity need not be shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “As an alternative to all of the foregoing [methods for serving process], process may be served on the agent designated by the corporation under s. 48.091....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “does not apply to service of process on insurance companies,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.