Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

526 So. 2d 764

526 So.2d 764

13 Fla.L.Weekly 1387

Nash v. Nash

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-06-10

Relies on 251 So. 2d 705 - Melton v. Melton · 479 So. 2d 306 - State v. Townsend · Evans v. Evans

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-06-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2016

17 state decisions

1401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ERVIN, Judge.

¶1We reverse the failure of the trial court in this marital dissolution case to reserve jurisdiction to award permanent periodic alimony to the wife in light of the wife’s limited earning potential, the promising career prospects of the husband and the long term nature of the marriage. See Melton v. Melton, 251 So.2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). Accord Mendonsa v. Mendonsa, 479 So.2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Evans v. Evans, 337 So.2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

¶2We affirm that portion of the final judgment of dissolution making each party responsible for their own attorney’s fees and costs in that the record reflects that both spouses have the financial ability to pay for their own attorney’s fees and costs.

¶3AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
/526/so2d/764 · .json · Public domain