United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
527 F.2d 1104 · 1975
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2014
12 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 4244
Relies on Faretta v. California · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri · Patterson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“error to defer to the wish of a person charged with a crime where there is reasonable cause to believe he may be presently insane.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is just as consistent with incompetency as it is with competency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.