Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 F.2d 817 - United States v. Jones

United States v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

527 F.2d 817 · 1975

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
4
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably United States v. Pinkney (1976), United States v. Alston (1979)

32 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

17019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Reed v. Reed · Berman v. Parker · Johnson v. Robison · Royster Guano Co v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]ince successive prosecutions on identical or lesser included D.C. and federal offenses emanate from the same sovereignty, they are precluded by double jeopardy considerations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Except as authorized by this subchapter, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally— (1) to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled substance; ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “teach that successive prosecutions by different sovereignties do not violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment and are therefore constitutionally permissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.