Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 F.3d 391 - In re Dean

In re Dean’s Empirical Analysis

527 F.3d 391 · 2008

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably In Re Poly-America, L.P. (2008), United States v. Monzel (2011)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

220200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3771

Relies on Cheney v. United States District Court for District of Columbia · Kenna v. United States District Court for the Central District of California · In re Antrobus · In re United States · United States v. Rigas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he movant may petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus. The court of appeals may issue the writ on the order of a single judge pursuant to circuit rule or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The court of appeals shall take up and decide such application forthwith within 72 hours after the petition has been filed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A writ of mandamus may issue only if (1) the petitioner has 'no other adequate means' to attain the desired relief; (2) the petitioner has demonstrated a right to the issuance of a writ that is 'clear and indisputable;' and (3) the issuing court, in the exercise of its discretion, is satisfied that the writ is 'appropriate under the circumstances.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ascertain the victims' views on the possible details of the [non-prosecution agreement].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.