Wegener v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

20 federal appellate · 5 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[F]ailure to disclose in a timely manner is equivalent to failure to disclose.”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Vanderberg v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc. · United States v. Hawley

2. “It is often difficult to distinguish between foundational facts and expert opinion, ■ and so to distinguish between impeachment and substantive evidence, see [Kennemur v. California, 133 Cal.App.3d 907 , 184 Cal.Rptr. 393 ,] 403 [(1982)], but Rule 26(a)(2)(C)(ii) re solves the dilemma in favor of disclosure by requiring parties to disclose expert testimony offered to contradict the expert testimony of the opposing party.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Advanced Analytics, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. · 985 F. Supp. 2d 900 - Serverside Group Ltd. v. Tactical 8 Technologies, L.L.C.

3. “We will reverse only if the district court's ruling was based on 'an erroneous view of the law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence' and affirmance would result in 'fundamental unfairness.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Parrish v. Bentonville Sch. Dist. · Landmark Infrastructure Holding Co. v. R.E.D. Invs., LLC