Williams v. Alameida

Decided May 30, 2008.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2008-05-30

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc. (2010), United States v. Overton (2009)

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on Williams v. Alameida

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-05-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Keith Lee Williams, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

¶2Elizabeth A. Keech, Julie A. Bachman, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

¶3D.C. No. CV-03-00196-NM, Central District of California, Los Angeles.

¶4Before: KIM McLANE WARDLAW, CARLOS T. BEA, and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.

¶5ORDER

¶6Upon receiving certification that Keith Lee Williams did not submit himself to California state authorities within the 60-day conditional period set forth in Williams v. Alameida, 511 F.3d 973, 974 (9th Cir.2007), we now dismiss Williams’s appeal pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

¶7IT IS SO ORDERED.