Haygood v. Younger’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2024
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 242 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · Estelle v. Gamble · Morrissey v. Brewer · Bell v. Wolfish · Parratt v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“; third, that 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 requires no particular state of mind on the defendant's part; fourth, that post-deprivation processes in the case of a deprivation of liberty can never provide the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Haygood v. Younger“[T]he plaintiff presented credible evidence that the defendants, after being put on notice, simply refused to investigate a computational error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Haygood v. Younger“by their actions intended to punish plaintiff and that this punishment violated the basic prohibition against inhuman treatment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Haygood v. Younger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.