527 F. Supp. 2d 1011 - In Re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson · Papasan v. Allain · Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is unknown whether the investigation will result in indictments or nothing at all.... the scope of the investigation is pure speculation. It may be broader or narrower than the allegations at issue.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“carries no weight in pleading an antitrust conspiracy claim”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“fall short of unusual, lockstep ... behavior”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.