State v. Monticello Developers, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731
Relies on Green v. United States · United States v. Scott · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · United States v. Wilson · Arizona v. Rumsey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The underlying idea ... is that the State with all its resources and power should not be allowed to make repeated attempts to convict an individual for an alleged offense, thereby subjecting him to embarrassment, expense and ordeal and compelling him to live in a continuing state of anxiety and insecurity, as well as enhancing the possibility that even though innocent he may be found guilty.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is that the State with all its resources and power should not be allowed to make repeated attempts to convict an individual for an alleged offense, thereby ... enhancing the possibility that even though innocent he may be found guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.