Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 N.E.2d 218 - State v. Fields

State v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2005

7 state decisions

50198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · State Ex Rel. Pollard v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty. · Smith v. State · Richardson v. State · State v. Turley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “From the above authorities it is clear that a grand jury is not limited by the rule of materiality to actions on the particular purposes for which it was called, but its inquiry can follow a wide range of subjects or crimes within its jurisdiction. False statements made to it concerning the additional subjects it chooses to pursue may be punished by charge of perjury. However, the State must make some indication on the record that it is pursuing such additional lines of inquiry. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Crecelius
  2. “(a) A person who: (1) Makes a false, material statement under oath or affirmation, knowing the statement to be false or not believing it to be true; ... commits perjury, a Class D felony. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Crecelius
  3. “that which is reasonably calculated to mislead an investigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Vandivier v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.