Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 P2D 459 - Galauska v. State

Galauska v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Coleman v. State (1976), Moreau v. State (1978)

29 state decisions

150197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lewis v. State · Anthony v. State · Watson v. State · Taggard v. State · Beavers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Of the three methods of proving character provided by the rule, evidence of specific instances of conduct is the most convincing. At the same time it possesses the greatest capacity to arouse prejudice, to confuse, to surprise, and to consume time. Consequently the rule confines the use of evidence of this kind to cases in which character is, in the strict sense, in issue and hence deserving of a searching inquiry. When character is used circumstantially and hence occupies a lesser status in the case, proof may be only by reputation and opinion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether the evidence presented a suffi- ' ciently detailed account of criminal activity and the defendant’s participation in this activity so that if unexplained or uncontradicted it would warrant a conviction of the person charged with an offense by the judge or jury trying the offense, (footnote omitted) 11”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence which would be legally admissible at trial shall be admissible before the grand jury,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.