Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 527 P2D 658 - State v. Pace

State v. Pace’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
5
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2020

6 state decisions

20197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Mellor · State v. Miller · State v. Faulkner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “had a chance to call it to [the juror's] attention”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is interesting to note that at oral argument counsel for the defense, nor anyone else recognized the significance or sagac- xty of one of the Justice s inquiries as to whether the slumber of the jurors occurred during the case in chief or during the defense’s examination, the answer to which was that the Van Winkle incident was appurtenant to the State’s presentation, no credit to the State or prejudice to defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.